Template:Grouped Data Parameter Estimation

Grouped Data Analysis
The grouped data type in Weibull++ is used for tests where there are groups of units having the same time-to-failure, or units are grouped together in intervals, or there are groups of units suspended at the same time. However, you must be cautious in using the different parameter estimation methods because different methods treat grouped data in different ways. ReliaSoft designed Weibull++ to treat grouped data in different ways to maximize the options available to you.

When Using Rank Regression (Least Squares)
When using grouped data, Weibull++ plots the data point corresponding to the highest rank position in each group. In other words, given 3 groups of 10 units, each failing at 100, 200, and 300 hours respectively, the three plotted points will be the end point of each group, or the 10th rank position out of 30, the 20th rank position out of 30 and the 30th rank position out of 30. This procedure is identical to standard procedures for using grouped data [19]. In cases where grouped data is used, it is assumed that the failures occurred at some time in the interval between the previous and current time to failure. In our example, this would be the same as saying that 10 units have failed in the interval between zero and 100 hours, another 10 units failed in the interval between 100 and 200 hours, and in the interval from 200 to 300 hours another 10 units failed. The rank regression analysis automatically takes this into account. If this assumption of interval failure is incorrect and 10 units failed exactly at 100 hours, 10 failed exactly at 200 hours and 10 failed exactly at 300 hours, it is recommended that you enter the data as non-grouped when using rank regression, or select the Use all data if grouped option from the Folio Control Panel's Set Analysis tab.

The Mathematics
Median ranks are used to obtain an estimate of the unreliability, $$Q({{T}_{j}}),$$ for each failure at a $$50%$$ confidence level. In the case of grouped data, the ranks are estimated for each group of failures, instead of each failure. For example, when using a group of 10 failures at 100 hours, 10 at 200 hours and 10 at 300 hours, Weibull++ estimates the median ranks ($$Z$$ values) by solving the cumulative binomial equation with the appropriate values for order number and total number of test units. For 10 failures at 100 hours, the median rank, $$Z,$$ is estimated by using:


 * $$0.50=\underset{k=j}{\overset{N}{\mathop \sum }}\,\left( \begin{matrix}

N \\ k \\ \end{matrix} \right){{Z}^{k}}{{\left( 1-Z \right)}^{N-k}}$$


 * with:


 * $$N=30,\text{ }J=10$$

where one $$Z$$ is obtained for the group, to represent the probability of 10 failures occurring out of 30. For 10 failures at 200 hours, $$Z$$ is estimated by using:


 * $$0.50=\underset{k=j}{\overset{N}{\mathop \sum }}\,\left( \begin{matrix}

N \\ k \\ \end{matrix} \right){{Z}^{k}}{{\left( 1-Z \right)}^{N-k}}$$


 * where:


 * $$N=30,\text{ }J=20$$

to represent the probability of 20 failures out of 30. For 10 failures at 300 hours, $$Z$$ is estimated by using:


 * $$0.50=\underset{k=j}{\overset{N}{\mathop \sum }}\,\left( \begin{matrix}

N \\ k \\ \end{matrix} \right){{Z}^{k}}{{\left( 1-Z \right)}^{N-k}}$$


 * where:


 * $$N=30,\text{ }J=30$$

to represent the probability of 30 failures out of 30.

When Using Maximum Likelihood
When using maximum likelihood methods, each individual time is explicitly used in the calculation of the parameters, thus there is no difference in the entry of a group of 10 units failing at 100 hours and 10 individual entries of 100 hours. This is inherent in the standard MLE method. In other words, no matter how the data were entered (i.e. as grouped or non-grouped) the results will be identical. When using maximum likelihood, we highly recommend entering redundant data in groups, as this significantly speeds up the calculations.