Template:Confidence bounds crow extended rga - Revision history

Lisa Hacker: /* Confidence Bounds */

2012-08-23T11:41:30Z

Confidence Bounds

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:41, 23 August 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~==Confidence Bounds==~~		#REDIRECT [[Crow Extended]]
	~~In this section, we will present the methods used in RGA to estimate the confidence bounds for the~~ Crow Extended model when applied to developmental testing data. RGA provides two methods to estimate the confidence bounds on demonstrated MTBF and failure intensity, projected MTBF and failure intensity and growth potential MTBF and failure intensity. The two methods are the Fisher Matrix (FM) method and Crow bounds. The Fisher Matrix approach is based on the Fisher Information Matrix and is commonly employed in the reliability field. The Crow bounds were developed by Dr. Larry Crow.
	~~<br>~~
	~~<br>~~
	~~{{bounds on demonstrated failure intensity rga}}~~

	~~{{bounds on demonstrated mtbf rga}}~~

	~~{{bounds on projected failure intensity rga}}~~

	~~{{bounds on projected mtbf rga}}~~

	~~{{bounds on growth potential failure intensity rga}}~~

	~~{{bounds on growth potential mtbf rga}}~~

Nicolette Young: /* Bounds on Growth Potential MTBF */

2012-01-10T20:53:41Z

Bounds on Growth Potential MTBF

Show changes

Nicolette Young: /* Bounds on Growth Potential Failure Intensity */

2012-01-10T20:52:28Z

Bounds on Growth Potential Failure Intensity

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 {{bounds on projected mtbf rga}}
-===Bounds on Growth Potential Failure Intensity===
+{{bounds on growth potential failure intensity rga}}
 ===Bounds on Growth Potential MTBF===
 ====Fisher Matrix Bounds====

Nicolette Young: /* Bounds on Projected MTBF */

2012-01-10T20:51:23Z

Bounds on Projected MTBF

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 {{bounds on projected failure intensity rga}}
-===Bounds on Projected MTBF===
+{{bounds on projected mtbf rga}}
 ===Bounds on Growth Potential Failure Intensity===
 ====Fisher Matrix Bounds====

Nicolette Young: /* Bounds on Projected Failure Intensity */

2012-01-10T20:50:41Z

Bounds on Projected Failure Intensity

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 {{bounds on demonstrated mtbf rga}}
-===Bounds on Projected Failure Intensity===
+{{bounds on projected failure intensity rga}}
 ===Bounds on Projected MTBF===
 ====Fisher Matrix Bounds====

Nicolette Young: /* Bounds on Demonstrated MTBF */

2012-01-10T20:49:22Z

Bounds on Demonstrated MTBF

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 {{bounds on demonstrated failure intensity rga}}
-===Bounds on Demonstrated MTBF===
+{{bounds on demonstrated mtbf rga}}
 ===Bounds on Projected Failure Intensity===
 ====Fisher Matrix Bounds====

Nicolette Young: /* Bounds on Demonstrated Failure Intensity */

2012-01-10T20:48:58Z

Bounds on Demonstrated Failure Intensity

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 <br>
 <br>
-===Bounds on Demonstrated Failure Intensity===
+{{bounds on demonstrated failure intensity rga}}
 ===Bounds on Demonstrated MTBF===
 ====Fisher Matrix Bounds====

Nicolette Young: Created page with '==Confidence Bounds== In this section, we will present the methods used in RGA to estimate the confidence bounds for the Crow Extended model when applied to developmental testing…'

2012-01-10T20:46:22Z

Created page with '==Confidence Bounds== In this section, we will present the methods used in RGA to estimate the confidence bounds for the Crow Extended model when applied to developmental testing…'

New page

==Confidence Bounds==
In this section, we will present the methods used in RGA to estimate the confidence bounds for the Crow Extended model when applied to developmental testing data. RGA provides two methods to estimate the confidence bounds on demonstrated MTBF and failure intensity, projected MTBF and failure intensity and growth potential MTBF and failure intensity. The two methods are the Fisher Matrix (FM) method and Crow bounds. The Fisher Matrix approach is based on the Fisher Information Matrix and is commonly employed in the reliability field. The Crow bounds were developed by Dr. Larry Crow.
 
 
===Bounds on Demonstrated Failure Intensity===
====Fisher Matrix Bounds====
If there are no BC failure modes, the demonstrated failure intensity is <math>{{\widehat{\lambda }}_{D}}(T)=\tfrac{{{N}_{A}}+{{N}_{BD}}}{T}</math> . Thus:

::<math>Var({{\hat{\lambda }}_{D}}(t))=\frac{{{N}_{A}}}{{{T}^{2}}}+\frac{{{N}_{BD}}}{{{T}^{2}}}=\frac{{{\lambda }_{D}}(t)}{T}</math>

 
:and:

::<math>\sqrt{T}\left( \frac{{{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{D}}(T)-{{\lambda }_{D}}(T)}{\sqrt{{{\lambda }_{D}}(T)}} \right)\sim N(0,1)</math>

::<math>{{\lambda }_{D}}(T)={{\hat{\lambda }}_{D}}(T)+\frac{{{C}^{2}}}{2}\pm \sqrt{{{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{D}}(T){{C}^{2}}+\frac{{{C}^{4}}}{4}}</math>

where <math>C=\tfrac{{{z}_{1-\alpha /2}}}{\sqrt{T}}</math> .
 
If there are BC failure modes, the demonstrated failure intensity, <math>{{\widehat{\lambda }}_{D}}(T)={{\widehat{\lambda }}_{CA}}</math> , is actually the instantaneous failure intensity based on all of the data. <math>{{\lambda }_{CA}}(T)</math> must be positive, thus <math>\ln {{\lambda }_{CA}}(T)</math> is approximately treated as being normally distributed.

::<math>\frac{\ln {{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{CA}}(T)-\ln {{\lambda }_{CA}}(T)}{\sqrt{Var(\ln {{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{CA}}(T)})}\sim N(0,1)</math>

The approximate confidence bounds on the instantaneous failure intensity are then estimated from:

::<math>CB={{\hat{\lambda }}_{CA}}(T){{e}^{\pm {{z}_{\alpha }}\sqrt{Var({{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{CA}}(T))}/{{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{i}}(T)}}</math>

where <math>{{\lambda }_{CA}}(t)=\lambda \beta {{T}^{\beta -1}}</math> .

::<math>\begin{align}
& Var({{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{CA}}(T))= & {{\left( \frac{\partial {{\lambda }_{CA}}(T)}{\partial \beta } \right)}^{2}}Var(\hat{\beta })+{{\left( \frac{\partial {{\lambda }_{CA}}(T)}{\partial \lambda } \right)}^{2}}Var(\hat{\lambda }) \\
& & +2\left( \frac{\partial {{\lambda }_{CA}}(T)}{\partial \beta } \right)\left( \frac{\partial {{\lambda }_{CA}}(T)}{\partial \lambda } \right)cov(\hat{\beta },\hat{\lambda })
\end{align}</math>

The variance calculation is the same as described in Chapter 5.
 
====Crow Bounds====
 
If there are no BC failure modes then:

::<math>\begin{align}
& {{[{{\lambda }_{D}}(T)]}_{l}}= & {{\widehat{\lambda }}_{D}}(T)\frac{\chi _{(2N,1-\alpha /2)}^{2}}{2N} \\
& {{[{{\lambda }_{D}}(T)]}_{u}}= & {{\widehat{\lambda }}_{D}}(T)\frac{\chi _{(2N,\alpha /2)}^{2}}{2N}
\end{align}</math>

where <math>{{\widehat{\lambda }}_{D}}(T)={{\widehat{\lambda }}_{CA}}</math> .
 
If there are BC modes then the confidence bounds on the demonstrated failure intensity are calculated as presented in Chapter 5.
 
===Bounds on Demonstrated MTBF===
====Fisher Matrix Bounds====
::<math>\begin{align}
& MTB{{F}_{{{D}_{L}}}}= & \frac{1}{{{[{{\lambda }_{D}}(T)]}_{U}}} \\
& MTB{{F}_{{{D}_{U}}}}= & \frac{1}{{{[{{\lambda }_{D}}(T)]}_{L}}}
\end{align}</math>

where <math>{{[{{\lambda }_{D}}(T)]}_{L}}</math> and <math>{{[{{\lambda }_{D}}(T)]}_{U}}</math> can be obtained from Eqn. (DR).
 
====Crow Bounds====
::<math>\begin{align}
& MTB{{F}_{{{D}_{L}}}}= & \frac{1}{{{[{{\lambda }_{D}}(T)]}_{U}}} \\
& MTB{{F}_{{{D}_{U}}}}= & \frac{1}{{{[{{\lambda }_{D}}(T)]}_{L}}}
\end{align}</math>

where <math>{{[{{\lambda }_{D}}(T)]}_{L}}</math> and <math>{{[{{\lambda }_{D}}(T)]}_{U}}</math> can be obtained from Eqn. (DCR).
 
===Bounds on Projected Failure Intensity===
====Fisher Matrix Bounds====
The projected failure intensity <math>{{\lambda }_{P}}(T)</math> must be positive, thus <math>\ln {{\lambda }_{P}}(T)</math> is approximately treated as being normally distributed as well:

::<math>\frac{\ln {{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{P}}(T)-\ln {{\lambda }_{P}}(t)}{\sqrt{Var(\ln {{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{P}}(T)})}\sim N(0,1)</math>

::<math>CB={{\hat{\lambda }}_{P}}(T){{e}^{\pm {{z}_{\alpha }}\sqrt{Var({{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{P}}(T))}/{{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{P}}(T)}}</math>

 
where:
 
:• <math>{{\hat{\lambda }}_{P}}(T)=\tfrac{{{N}_{A}}}{T}+\underset{i=1}{\overset{M}{\mathop{\sum }}}\,(1-{{d}_{i}})\tfrac{{{N}_{i}}}{T}+\overline{d}\tfrac{M}{T}\bar{\beta }</math> when there are no BC modes.
:• <math>{{\hat{\lambda }}_{P}}(T)={{\widehat{\lambda }}_{EM}}={{\widehat{\lambda }}_{CA}}-{{\widehat{\lambda }}_{BD}}+\underset{i=1}{\overset{M}{\mathop{\sum }}}\,(1-{{d}_{i}})\tfrac{{{N}_{i}}}{T}+\overline{d}\widehat{h}(T|BD)</math> when there are BC modes.
:• <math>{{N}_{i}}</math> is the total failure number of the <math>{{i}^{th}}</math> distinct BD mode.
 
You can then get:

::<math>Var({{\lambda }_{P}}(T))\approx Var({{\hat{\gamma }}_{GP}})+\mu _{d}^{2}Var(h(T))\approx \frac{{{{\hat{r}}}_{GP}}}{T}+\mu _{d}^{2}Var(h(T))</math>

:where:

::<math>\begin{align}
& \hat{h}(T)= & \frac{M}{T}\bar{\beta } \\
& Var(\hat{h}(T))= & {{(\frac{M}{T})}^{2}}Var(\bar{\beta })={{(\frac{M}{T})}^{2}}{{(\frac{M}{M-1})}^{2}}Var(\hat{\beta })=\frac{{{M}^{4}}}{{{T}^{2}}{{(M-1)}^{2}}}Var(\hat{\beta })
\end{align}</math>

The <math>Var(\hat{\beta })</math> can be obtained from Fisher Matrix based on <math>M</math> distinct BD modes.
 

====Crow Bounds====
::<math>\begin{align}
& {{[{{\lambda }_{P}}(T)]}_{L}}= & {{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{P}}(T)+\frac{{{C}^{2}}}{2}-\sqrt{{{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{P}}(T)\cdot {{C}^{2}}+\frac{{{C}^{4}}}{4}} \\
& {{[{{\lambda }_{P}}(T)]}_{U}}= & {{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{P}}(T)+\frac{{{C}^{2}}}{2}+\sqrt{{{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{P}}(T)\cdot \ \,{{C}^{2}}+\frac{{{C}^{4}}}{4}}
\end{align}</math>

where <math>C=\tfrac{{{z}_{1-\alpha /2}}}{\sqrt{T}}</math> .
 
===Bounds on Projected MTBF===
====Fisher Matrix Bounds====
::<math>\begin{align}
& MTB{{F}_{{{P}_{L}}}}= & \frac{1}{{{[{{\lambda }_{P}}(T)]}_{U}}} \\
& MTB{{F}_{{{P}_{U}}}}= & \frac{1}{{{[{{\lambda }_{P}}(T)]}_{L}}}
\end{align}</math>

<math>{{[{{\lambda }_{P}}(T)]}_{U}}</math> and <math>{{[{{\lambda }_{P}}(T)]}_{L}}</math> can be obtained from Eqn. (extended25).
 
====Crow Bounds====
::<math>\begin{align}
& MTB{{F}_{{{P}_{L}}}}= & \frac{1}{{{[{{\lambda }_{P}}(T)]}_{U}}} \\
& MTB{{F}_{{{P}_{U}}}}= & \frac{1}{{{[{{\lambda }_{P}}(T)]}_{L}}}
\end{align}</math>

<math>{{[{{\lambda }_{P}}(T)]}_{U}}</math> and <math>{{[{{\lambda }_{P}}(T)]}_{L}}</math> can be obtained from Eqn. (PCR).
 
===Bounds on Growth Potential Failure Intensity===
====Fisher Matrix Bounds====
If there are no BC failure modes, the growth potential failure intensity is <math>{{\widehat{r}}_{GP}}(T)=\tfrac{{{N}_{A}}}{T}+\underset{i=1}{\overset{M}{\mathop{\sum }}}\,(1-{{d}_{i}})\tfrac{{{N}_{i}}}{T}</math> .

:Then:

::<math>\begin{align}
& Var({{\widehat{r}}_{GP}})= & \frac{1}{T}\left[ \frac{{{N}_{A}}}{T}+\underset{i=1}{\overset{M}{\mathop \sum }}\,{{(1-{{d}_{i}})}^{2}}\frac{{{N}_{i}}}{T} \right] \\
& \le & \frac{1}{T}\left[ \frac{{{N}_{A}}}{T}+\underset{i=1}{\overset{M}{\mathop \sum }}\,(1-{{d}_{i}})\frac{{{N}_{i}}}{T} \right] \\
& = & \frac{{{r}_{GP}}}{T}
\end{align}</math>

If there are BC failure modes, the growth potential failure intensity is <math>{{\widehat{r}}_{GP}}(T)={{\widehat{\lambda }}_{CA}}-{{\widehat{\lambda }}_{BD}}+\underset{i=1}{\overset{M}{\mathop{\sum }}}\,(1-{{d}_{i}})\tfrac{{{N}_{i}}}{T},</math> <math>Var({{\widehat{r}}_{GP}})\approx \tfrac{{{r}_{GP}}}{T}</math> . Therefore:

::<math>\sqrt{T}\left( \frac{{{{\hat{r}}}_{GP}}-{{r}_{GP}}}{\sqrt{{{r}_{GP}}}} \right)\sim N(0,1)</math>

The confidence bounds on the growth potential failure intensity are as follows:

::<math>\begin{align}
& {{r}_{L}}= & {{{\hat{r}}}_{GP}}+\frac{{{C}^{2}}}{2}-\sqrt{{{{\hat{r}}}_{GP}}\,{{C}^{2}}+\frac{{{C}^{4}}}{4}} \\
& {{r}_{U}}= & {{{\hat{r}}}_{GP}}+\frac{{{C}^{2}}}{2}+\sqrt{{{{\hat{r}}}_{GP}}\,{{C}^{2}}+\frac{{{C}^{4}}}{4}}
\end{align}</math>

where <math>C=\tfrac{{{z}_{1-\alpha /2}}}{\sqrt{T}}</math> .
 

====Crow Bounds====
The Crow bounds for the growth potential failure intensity are the same as the Fisher Matrix bounds.
 
===Bounds on Growth Potential MTBF===
====Fisher Matrix Bounds====
::<math>\begin{align}
& MTB{{F}_{G{{P}_{L}}}}= & \frac{1}{{{r}_{U}}} \\
& MTB{{F}_{G{{P}_{U}}}}= & \frac{1}{{{r}_{L}}}
\end{align}</math>

where <math>{{r}_{U}}</math> and <math>{{r}_{L}}</math> can be obtained from Eqn. (GPR).
 
====Crow Bounds====
The Crow bounds for the growth potential MTBF are the same as the Fisher Matrix bounds.
 
 
'''Example 3'''
 
Calculate the 2-sided 90% confidence bounds on the demonstrated, projected and growth potential failure intensity for the data in Table 9.1.
 
 
'''Solution'''
 
The estimated demonstrated failure intensity is <math>{{\widehat{\lambda }}_{D}}(T)=\tfrac{{{N}_{A}}+{{N}_{B}}}{T}=0.1050</math> . Based on this value, the Fisher Matrix confidence bounds for the demonstrated failure intensity at the 90% confidence level are:

::<math>\begin{align}
& {{[{{\lambda }_{D}}(T)]}_{L}}= & {{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{D}}(T)+\frac{{{C}^{2}}}{2}-\sqrt{{{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{D}}(T){{C}^{2}}+\frac{{{C}^{4}}}{4}} \\
& = & 0.08152
\end{align}</math>

::<math>\begin{align}
& {{[{{\lambda }_{D}}(T)]}_{U}}= & {{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{D}}(T)+\frac{{{C}^{2}}}{2}+\sqrt{{{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{D}}(T){{C}^{2}}+\frac{{{C}^{4}}}{4}} \\
& = & 0.13525
\end{align}</math>

The Crow confidence bounds for the demonstrated failure intensity at the 90% confidence level are:

::<math>\begin{align}
& {{[{{\lambda }_{D}}(T)]}_{L}}= & {{\widehat{\lambda }}_{D}}(T)\frac{\chi _{(2N,1-\alpha /2)}^{2}}{2N} \\
& = & 0.07985 \\
& {{[{{\lambda }_{D}}(T)]}_{U}}= & {{\widehat{\lambda }}_{D}}(T)\frac{\chi _{(2N,\alpha /2)}^{2}}{2N} \\
& = & 0.13299
\end{align}</math>

The projected failure intensity is . Based on this value, the Fisher Matrix confidence bounds at the 90% confidence level for the projected failure intensity are:

::<math>\begin{align}
& {{[{{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{P}}(T)]}_{L}}= & {{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{P}}(T){{e}^{{{z}_{\alpha }}\sqrt{Var({{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{P}}(T))}/{{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{P}}(T)}} \\
& = & 0.04902
\end{align}</math>

::<math>\begin{align}
& {{[{{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{P}}(T)]}_{U}}= & {{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{P}}(T){{e}^{-{{z}_{\alpha }}\sqrt{Var({{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{P}}(T))}/{{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{P}}(T)}} \\
& = & 0.08915
\end{align}</math>

The Crow confidence bounds for the projected failure intensity are:

::<math>\begin{align}
& {{[{{\lambda }_{P}}(T)]}_{L}}= & {{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{P}}(T)+\frac{{{C}^{2}}}{2}-\sqrt{{{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{P}}(T)\cdot {{C}^{2}}+\frac{{{C}^{4}}}{4}} \\
& = & 0.04807 \\
& {{[{{\lambda }_{P}}(T)]}_{U}}= & {{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{P}}(T)+\frac{{{C}^{2}}}{2}+\sqrt{{{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{P}}(T)\cdot \ \,{{C}^{2}}+\frac{{{C}^{4}}}{4}} \\
& = & 0.09090
\end{align}</math>

The growth potential failure intensity is <math>\widehat{r}_{GP} (T) = \left (\frac{N_A}{T} + \sum_{i=1}^M (1-d_i) \tfrac{N_i}{T} \right ) = 0.04455 </math>.

 
Based on this value, the Fisher Matrix and Crow confidence bounds at the 90% confidence level for the growth potential failure intensity are:

::<math>\begin{align}
& {{r}_{L}}= & {{{\hat{r}}}_{GP}}+\frac{{{C}^{2}}}{2}-\sqrt{{{{\hat{r}}}_{GP}}{{C}^{2}}+\frac{{{C}^{4}}}{4}} \\
& = & 0.03020 \\
& {{r}_{U}}= & {{{\hat{r}}}_{GP}}+\frac{{{C}^{2}}}{2}+\sqrt{{{{\hat{r}}}_{GP}}{{C}^{2}}+\frac{{{C}^{4}}}{4}} \\
& = & 0.0656
\end{align}</math>

Figure extendedpic7 shows the Fisher Matrix confidence bounds at the 90% confidence level for the demonstrated, projected and growth potential failure intensity. Figure extendedpic8 shows these bounds based on the Crow method.
 
 
[[Image:rga9.8.png|thumb|center|400px|Fisher Matrix confidence bounds for the failure intensity.]]
 
 
[[Image:rga9.9.png|thumb|center|400px|Crow confidence bounds for the failure intensity.]]

'''Example 4'''
 
Calculate the 2-sided confidence bounds at the 90% confidence level on the demonstrated, projected and growth potential MTBF for the data in Table 9.3.
 
 
'''Solution'''
 
For this example, there are A, BC and BD failure modes, so the estimated demonstrated failure intensity, <math>{{\hat{\lambda }}_{D}}(T)</math> , is simply the Crow-AMSAA model applied to all A, BC, and BD data.

::<math>{{\hat{\lambda }}_{D}}(T)={{\widehat{\lambda }}_{CA}}=\widehat{\lambda }\widehat{\beta }{{T}^{\widehat{\beta }-1}}=0.12744</math>

Therefore, the demonstrated MTBF is:

::<math>MTB{{F}_{D}}={{[{{\hat{\lambda }}_{D}}(T)]}^{-1}}=7.84708</math>

Based on this value, the Fisher Matrix confidence bounds for the demonstrated failure intensity at the 90% confidence level are:

::<math>\begin{align}
& {{[{{\lambda }_{D}}(T)]}_{L}}= & {{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{CA}}(T){{e}^{{{z}_{\alpha }}\sqrt{Var({{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{CA}}(T))}/{{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{i}}(T)}} \\
& = & 0.09339
\end{align}</math>

::<math>\begin{align}
& {{[{{\lambda }_{D}}(T)]}_{U}}= & {{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{CA}}(T){{e}^{-{{z}_{\alpha }}\sqrt{Var({{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{CA}}(T))}/{{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{i}}(T)}} \\
& = & 0.17390
\end{align}</math>

The Fisher Matrix confidence bounds for the demonstrated MTBF at the 90% confidence level are:

::<math>\begin{align}
& MTB{{F}_{{{D}_{L}}}}= & \frac{1}{{{[{{\lambda }_{D}}(T)]}_{U}}} \\
& = & 5.75054 \\
& MTB{{F}_{{{D}_{U}}}}= & \frac{1}{{{[{{\lambda }_{D}}(T)]}_{L}}} \\
& = & 10.70799
\end{align}</math>

The Crow confidence bounds for the demonstrated MTBF at the 90% confidence level are:

::<math>\begin{align}
& MTB{{F}_{{{D}_{L}}}}= & \frac{1}{{{[{{\lambda }_{D}}(T)]}_{U}}} \\
& = & \frac{1}{{{\widehat{\lambda }}_{D}}(T)\tfrac{{{\chi }^{2}}(2N,\alpha /2)}{2N}} \\
& = & 5.6325 \\
& MTB{{F}_{{{D}_{U}}}}= & \frac{1}{{{[{{\lambda }_{D}}(T)]}_{L}}} \\
& = & \frac{1}{{{\widehat{\lambda }}_{D}}(T)\tfrac{{{\chi }^{2}}(2N,1-\alpha /2)}{2N}} \\
& = & 10.8779
\end{align}</math>

 
The projected failure intensity is <math>\hat{\lambda}_P (T) = \widehat{\lambda}_{CA} - \widehat{\lambda}_{BD} + \sum_{i=1}^M (1-d_i) \tfrac{N_i}{T} + \bar{d}\widehat{h}(T|BD) = 0.0885 </math>. Based on this value, the Fisher Matrix confidence bounds at the 90% confidence level for the projected failure intensity are:

::<math>\begin{align}
& {{[{{\lambda }_{P}}(T)]}_{L}}= & {{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{P}}(T){{e}^{{{z}_{\alpha }}\sqrt{Var({{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{P}}(T))}/{{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{P}}(T)}} \\
& = & 0.0681
\end{align}</math>

::<math>\begin{align}
& {{[{{\lambda }_{P}}(T)]}_{U}}= & {{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{P}}(T){{e}^{-{{z}_{\alpha }}\sqrt{Var({{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{P}}(T))}/{{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{P}}(T)}} \\
& = & 0.1152
\end{align}</math>

The Fisher Matrix confidence bounds for the projected MTBF at the 90% confidence level are:

::<math>\begin{align}
& MTB{{F}_{{{P}_{L}}}}= & \frac{1}{{{[{{\lambda }_{P}}(T)]}_{U}}} \\
& = & 8.6818 \\
& MTB{{F}_{{{P}_{U}}}}= & \frac{1}{{{[{{\lambda }_{P}}(T)]}_{L}}} \\
& = & 14.6926
\end{align}</math>

The Crow confidence bounds for the projected failure intensity are:

::<math>\begin{align}
& {{[{{\lambda }_{P}}(T)]}_{L}}= & {{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{P}}(T)+\frac{{{C}^{2}}}{2}-\sqrt{{{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{P}}(T)\cdot \ \,{{C}^{2}}+\frac{{{C}^{4}}}{4}} \\
& = & 0.0672 \\
& {{[{{\lambda }_{P}}(T)]}_{U}}= & {{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{P}}(T)+\frac{{{C}^{2}}}{2}+\sqrt{{{{\hat{\lambda }}}_{P}}(T)\cdot {{C}^{2}}+\frac{{{C}^{4}}}{4}} \\
& = & 0.1166
\end{align}</math>

The Crow confidence bounds for the projected MTBF at the 90% confidence level are:

::<math>\begin{align}
& MTB{{F}_{{{P}_{L}}}}= & \frac{1}{{{[{{\widehat{\lambda }}_{P}}(T)]}_{U}}} \\
& = & 8.5743 \\
& MTB{{F}_{{{P}_{U}}}}= & \frac{1}{{{[{{\widehat{\lambda }}_{P}}(T)]}_{L}}} \\
& = & 14.8769
\end{align}</math>

The growth potential failure intensity is <math>\widehat{\lambda}_{GP} = \widehat{\lambda}_{CA} - \widehat{\lambda}_{BD} + \sum_{i=1}^M (1-d_i) \tfrac{N_i}{T} = 0.0670 </math>.
<math>\hat{\lambda}_P (T) = \widehat{\lambda}_{CA} - \widehat{\lambda}_{BD} + \sum_{i=1}^M (1-d_i) \tfrac{N_i}{T} + \bar{d}\widehat{h}(T|BD) = 0.0885 </math>.Based on this value, the Fisher Matrix and Crow confidence bounds at the 90% confidence level for the growth potential failure intensity are:

::<math>\begin{align}
& {{r}_{L}}= & {{{\hat{r}}}_{GP}}+\frac{{{C}^{2}}}{2}-\sqrt{{{{\hat{r}}}_{GP}}{{C}^{2}}+\frac{{{C}^{4}}}{4}} \\
& = & 0.0488 \\
& {{r}_{U}}= & {{{\hat{r}}}_{GP}}+\frac{{{C}^{2}}}{2}+\sqrt{{{{\hat{r}}}_{GP}}{{C}^{2}}+\frac{{{C}^{4}}}{4}} \\
& = & 0.0919
\end{align}</math>

The Fisher Matrix and Crow confidence bounds for the growth potential MTBF at the 90% confidence level are:

::<math>\begin{align}
& MTB{{F}_{G{{P}_{L}}}}= & \frac{1}{{{r}_{U}}} \\
& = & 10.8790 \\
& MTB{{F}_{G{{P}_{U}}}}= & \frac{1}{{{r}_{L}}} \\
& = & 20.4855
\end{align}</math>

Figure extendedpic9 shows the Fisher Matrix confidence bounds at the 90% confidence level for the demonstrated, projected and growth potential MTBF. Figure extendedpic10 shows these bounds based on the Crow method.

[[Image:rga9.10.png|thumb|center|400px|Fisher Matrix confidence bounds on MTBF.]]
 
 
[[Image:rga9.11.png|thumb|center|400px|Crow confidence bounds on MTBF.]]