<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.reliawiki.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Template%3AFielded_systems</id>
	<title>Template:Fielded systems - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.reliawiki.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Template%3AFielded_systems"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.reliawiki.com/index.php?title=Template:Fielded_systems&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-08T07:10:41Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.44.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.reliawiki.com/index.php?title=Template:Fielded_systems&amp;diff=33663&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Richard House: Redirected page to RGA Overview#Fielded Systems</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.reliawiki.com/index.php?title=Template:Fielded_systems&amp;diff=33663&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2012-08-24T00:10:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Redirected page to &lt;a href=&quot;/index.php/RGA_Overview#Fielded_Systems&quot; title=&quot;RGA Overview&quot;&gt;RGA Overview#Fielded Systems&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122;&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;tr class=&quot;diff-title&quot; lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 00:10, 24 August 2012&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l1&quot;&gt;Line 1:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 1:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;==Fielded Systems==&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;#REDIRECT &lt;/ins&gt;[&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;[RGA_Overview#Fielded_Systems]&lt;/ins&gt;]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;When a complex system with new technology is fielded and subjected to a customer use environment, there is often considerable interest in assessing its reliability and other related performance metrics, such as availability. This interest in evaluating the system reliability based on actual customer usage failure data may be motivated by a number of factors. For example, the reliability that is generally measured during development is typically related to the system&#039;s inherent reliability capability. This inherent capability may differ from actual use experience because of different operating conditions or environment, different maintenance policies, different levels of experience of maintenance personnel, etc. Although operational tests are conducted for many systems during development, it is generally recognized that in many cases these tests may not yield complete data representative of an actual use environment. Moreover, the testing during development is typically limited by the usual cost and schedule constraints, which prevent obtaining a system&#039;s reliability profile over an extended portion of its life. Other interests in measuring the reliability of a fielded system may center on, for example, logistics and maintenance policies, quality and manufacturing issues, burn-in, wearout, mission reliability or warranties.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-side-added&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-side-added&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-side-added&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Most complex systems are repaired, not replaced, when they fail. For example, a complex communication system or a truck would be repaired upon failure, not thrown away and replaced by a new system. A number of books and papers in literature have stressed that the usual non-repairable reliability analysis methodologies, such as the Weibull distribution, are not appropriate for repairable system reliability analyses and have suggested the use of nonhomogeneous Poisson process models instead.&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-side-added&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The homogeneous process is equivalent to the widely used Poisson distribution and exponential times between system failures can be modeled appropriately when the system&#039;s failure intensity is not affected by the system&#039;s age. However, to realistically consider burn-in, wearout, useful life, maintenance policies, warranties, mission reliability, etc., the analyst will often require an approach that recognizes that the failure intensity of these systems may not be constant over the operating life of interest but may change with system age. A useful, and generally practical, extension of the homogeneous Poisson process,  is the nonhomogeneous Poisson process, which allows for the system failure intensity to change with system age. Typically, the reliability analysis of a repairable system under customer use will involve data generated by multiple systems. Crow &lt;/del&gt;[&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;17&lt;/del&gt;] &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;proposed the Weibull process or power law nonhomogeneous Poisson process for this type of analysis and developed appropriate statistical procedures for maximum likelihood estimation, goodness-of-fit and confidence bounds. &lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-side-added&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-side-added&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Richard House</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.reliawiki.com/index.php?title=Template:Fielded_systems&amp;diff=11301&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Nicolette Young: Created page with &#039;==Fielded Systems== When a complex system with new technology is fielded and subjected to a customer use environment, there is often considerable interest in assessing its reliab…&#039;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.reliawiki.com/index.php?title=Template:Fielded_systems&amp;diff=11301&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2012-01-05T17:44:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;#039;==Fielded Systems== When a complex system with new technology is fielded and subjected to a customer use environment, there is often considerable interest in assessing its reliab…&amp;#039;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;==Fielded Systems==&lt;br /&gt;
When a complex system with new technology is fielded and subjected to a customer use environment, there is often considerable interest in assessing its reliability and other related performance metrics, such as availability. This interest in evaluating the system reliability based on actual customer usage failure data may be motivated by a number of factors. For example, the reliability that is generally measured during development is typically related to the system&amp;#039;s inherent reliability capability. This inherent capability may differ from actual use experience because of different operating conditions or environment, different maintenance policies, different levels of experience of maintenance personnel, etc. Although operational tests are conducted for many systems during development, it is generally recognized that in many cases these tests may not yield complete data representative of an actual use environment. Moreover, the testing during development is typically limited by the usual cost and schedule constraints, which prevent obtaining a system&amp;#039;s reliability profile over an extended portion of its life. Other interests in measuring the reliability of a fielded system may center on, for example, logistics and maintenance policies, quality and manufacturing issues, burn-in, wearout, mission reliability or warranties.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Most complex systems are repaired, not replaced, when they fail. For example, a complex communication system or a truck would be repaired upon failure, not thrown away and replaced by a new system. A number of books and papers in literature have stressed that the usual non-repairable reliability analysis methodologies, such as the Weibull distribution, are not appropriate for repairable system reliability analyses and have suggested the use of nonhomogeneous Poisson process models instead.&lt;br /&gt;
The homogeneous process is equivalent to the widely used Poisson distribution and exponential times between system failures can be modeled appropriately when the system&amp;#039;s failure intensity is not affected by the system&amp;#039;s age. However, to realistically consider burn-in, wearout, useful life, maintenance policies, warranties, mission reliability, etc., the analyst will often require an approach that recognizes that the failure intensity of these systems may not be constant over the operating life of interest but may change with system age. A useful, and generally practical, extension of the homogeneous Poisson process,  is the nonhomogeneous Poisson process, which allows for the system failure intensity to change with system age. Typically, the reliability analysis of a repairable system under customer use will involve data generated by multiple systems. Crow [17] proposed the Weibull process or power law nonhomogeneous Poisson process for this type of analysis and developed appropriate statistical procedures for maximum likelihood estimation, goodness-of-fit and confidence bounds. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Nicolette Young</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>