Lisa Hacker: /* Model Development */

2012-08-23T23:06:19Z

Model Development

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:06, 23 August 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~===Model Development===~~		#REDIRECT [[Crow-AMSAA - NHPP]]
	Suppose system development is represented by <math>i</math> configurations. This corresponds to <math>i-1</math> configuration changes, unless fixes are applied at the end of the test phase, in which case there would be <math>i</math> configuration changes. Let <math>{{N}_{i}}</math> be the number of trials during configuration <math>i</math> and let <math>{{M}_{i}}</math> be the number of failures during configuration <math>i</math> . Then the cumulative number of trials through configuration <math>i</math> , namely <math>{{T}_{i}}</math> , is the sum of the <math>{{N}_{i}}</math> for all <math>i</math> , or:

	~~::<math>{{T}_{i}}=\underset{}{\overset{}{\mathop \sum }}\,{{N}_{i}}</math>~~

	~~And the cumulative number of failures through configuration <math>i</math> , namely <math>{{K}_{i}}</math> , is the sum of the <math>{{M}_{i}}</math> for all <math>i</math> , or:~~

	~~::<math>{{K}_{i}}=\underset{}{\overset{}{\mathop \sum }}\,{{M}_{i}}</math>~~

	~~The expected value of <math>{{K}_{i}}</math> can be expressed as <math>E~~[~~{{K}_{i}}]</math> and defined as the expected number of failures by the end of configuration <math>i</math> . Applying the learning curve property to <math>E~~[~~{{K}_{i}}]</math> implies:~~

	~~::<math>E\left[ {{K}_{i}} \right]=\lambda T_{i}^{\beta }</math>~~

	Denote <math>{{f}_{1}}</math> as the probability of failure for configuration 1 and use it to develop a generalized equation for <math>{{f}_{i}}</math> in terms of the <math>{{T}_{i}}</math> and <math>{{N}_{i}}</math> . From Eqn. (expectedn), the expected number of failures by the end of configuration 1 is:

	~~::<math>E\left[ {{K}_{1}} \right~~]~~=\lambda T_{1}^{\beta }={{f}_{1}}{{N}_{1}}</math>~~

	~~::<math>\therefore {{f}_{1}}=\frac{\lambda T_{1}^{\beta }}{{{N}_{1}}}</math>~~

	Applying Eqn. (expectedn) again and noting that the expected number of failures by the end of configuration 2 is the sum of the expected number of failures in configuration 1 and the expected number of failures in configuration 2:

	~~::<math>\begin{align}~~
	~~& E\left[ {{K}_{2}} \right~~]~~= & \lambda T_{2}^{\beta } \\~~
	~~& = & {{f}_{1}}{{N}_{1}}+{{f}_{2}}{{N}_{2}} \\~~
	~~& = & \lambda T_{1}^{\beta }+{{f}_{2}}{{N}_{2}}~~
	~~\end{align}</math>~~

	~~::<math>\therefore {{f}_{2}}=\frac{\lambda T_{2}^{\beta }-\lambda T_{1}^{\beta }}{{{N}_{2}}}</math>~~

	~~By this method of inductive reasoning, a generalized equation for the failure probability on a configuration basis, <math>{{f}_{i}}</math> , is obtained, such that:~~

	~~::<math>{{f}_{i}}=\frac{\lambda T_{i}^{\beta }-\lambda T_{i-1}^{\beta }}{{{N}_{i}}}</math>~~

	For the special case where <math>{{N}_{i}}=1</math> for all <math>i</math> , Eqn. (dfi) becomes a smooth curve, <math>{{g}_{i}}</math> , that represents the probability of failure for trial by trial data, or:

	~~::<math>{{g}_{i}}=\lambda \cdot {{i}^{\beta }}-\lambda \cdot {{\left( i-1 \right)}^{\beta }}</math>~~

	In Eqn. (dfi1), <math>i</math> represents the trial number. Thus using Eqn. (dfi), an equation for the reliability (probability of success) for the <math>{{i}^{th}}</math> configuration is obtained:

	~~::<math>{{R}_{i}}=1-{{f}_{i}}</math>~~

	~~And using Eqn. (dfi1), the equation for the reliability for the <math>{{i}^{th}}</math> trial is:~~

	~~::<math>{{R}_{i}}=1-{{g}_{i}}</math>~~

Nicolette Young: Created page with '===Model Development=== Suppose system development is represented by $i$ configurations. This corresponds to $i-1$ configuration changes, unless fixes a…'

2012-01-09T17:08:53Z

Created page with '===Model Development=== Suppose system development is represented by <math>i</math> configurations. This corresponds to <math>i-1</math> configuration changes, unless fixes a…'

New page

===Model Development===
Suppose system development is represented by <math>i</math> configurations. This corresponds to <math>i-1</math> configuration changes, unless fixes are applied at the end of the test phase, in which case there would be <math>i</math> configuration changes. Let <math>{{N}_{i}}</math> be the number of trials during configuration <math>i</math> and let <math>{{M}_{i}}</math> be the number of failures during configuration <math>i</math> . Then the cumulative number of trials through configuration <math>i</math> , namely <math>{{T}_{i}}</math> , is the sum of the <math>{{N}_{i}}</math> for all <math>i</math> , or:

::<math>{{T}_{i}}=\underset{}{\overset{}{\mathop \sum }}\,{{N}_{i}}</math>

And the cumulative number of failures through configuration <math>i</math> , namely <math>{{K}_{i}}</math> , is the sum of the <math>{{M}_{i}}</math> for all <math>i</math> , or:

::<math>{{K}_{i}}=\underset{}{\overset{}{\mathop \sum }}\,{{M}_{i}}</math>

The expected value of <math>{{K}_{i}}</math> can be expressed as <math>E[{{K}_{i}}]</math> and defined as the expected number of failures by the end of configuration <math>i</math> . Applying the learning curve property to <math>E[{{K}_{i}}]</math> implies:

::<math>E\left[ {{K}_{i}} \right]=\lambda T_{i}^{\beta }</math>

Denote <math>{{f}_{1}}</math> as the probability of failure for configuration 1 and use it to develop a generalized equation for <math>{{f}_{i}}</math> in terms of the <math>{{T}_{i}}</math> and <math>{{N}_{i}}</math> . From Eqn. (expectedn), the expected number of failures by the end of configuration 1 is:

::<math>E\left[ {{K}_{1}} \right]=\lambda T_{1}^{\beta }={{f}_{1}}{{N}_{1}}</math>

::<math>\therefore {{f}_{1}}=\frac{\lambda T_{1}^{\beta }}{{{N}_{1}}}</math>

Applying Eqn. (expectedn) again and noting that the expected number of failures by the end of configuration 2 is the sum of the expected number of failures in configuration 1 and the expected number of failures in configuration 2:

::<math>\begin{align}
& E\left[ {{K}_{2}} \right]= & \lambda T_{2}^{\beta } \\
& = & {{f}_{1}}{{N}_{1}}+{{f}_{2}}{{N}_{2}} \\
& = & \lambda T_{1}^{\beta }+{{f}_{2}}{{N}_{2}}
\end{align}</math>

::<math>\therefore {{f}_{2}}=\frac{\lambda T_{2}^{\beta }-\lambda T_{1}^{\beta }}{{{N}_{2}}}</math>

By this method of inductive reasoning, a generalized equation for the failure probability on a configuration basis, <math>{{f}_{i}}</math> , is obtained, such that:

::<math>{{f}_{i}}=\frac{\lambda T_{i}^{\beta }-\lambda T_{i-1}^{\beta }}{{{N}_{i}}}</math>

For the special case where <math>{{N}_{i}}=1</math> for all <math>i</math> , Eqn. (dfi) becomes a smooth curve, <math>{{g}_{i}}</math> , that represents the probability of failure for trial by trial data, or:

::<math>{{g}_{i}}=\lambda \cdot {{i}^{\beta }}-\lambda \cdot {{\left( i-1 \right)}^{\beta }}</math>

In Eqn. (dfi1), <math>i</math> represents the trial number. Thus using Eqn. (dfi), an equation for the reliability (probability of success) for the <math>{{i}^{th}}</math> configuration is obtained:

::<math>{{R}_{i}}=1-{{f}_{i}}</math>

And using Eqn. (dfi1), the equation for the reliability for the <math>{{i}^{th}}</math> trial is:

::<math>{{R}_{i}}=1-{{g}_{i}}</math>

Template:Model development camsaa-cd - Revision history

Lisa Hacker: /* Model Development */

Nicolette Young: Created page with '===Model Development=== Suppose system development is represented by i configurations. This corresponds to i-1 configuration changes, unless fixes a…'

Nicolette Young: Created page with '===Model Development=== Suppose system development is represented by $i$ configurations. This corresponds to $i-1$ configuration changes, unless fixes a…'