Two Level Optimum Test Plan for One Stress - Revision history

Kate Racaza at 18:23, 28 September 2015

2015-09-28T18:23:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:23, 28 September 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Reference Example\|{{Banner ALTA Reference Examples}}}}		{{Reference Example\|{{Banner ALTA Reference Examples}}}}

	This example ~~compares~~ the results for the 2 level statistically optimum test plan for one stress.		This example validates the results for the 2 level statistically optimum test plan for one stress in ALTA.

Kate Racaza at 16:36, 13 June 2014

2014-06-13T16:36:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:36, 13 June 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Reference Example\|~~ALTA_Reference_Examples_Banner.png\|ALTA_Reference_Examples~~}}		{{Reference Example\|{{Banner ALTA Reference Examples}}}}

	This example compares the results for the 2 level statistically optimum test plan for one stress.		This example compares the results for the 2 level statistically optimum test plan for one stress.

Kate Racaza at 15:20, 13 June 2014

2014-06-13T15:20:30Z

Kate Racaza at 16:09, 12 June 2014

2014-06-12T16:09:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:09, 12 June 2014
Line 51:		Line 51:


	This test plan shows that:		This test plan shows that (starting at row 23 in the picture above):

	* The low stress level ~~(row 23 in the picture above)~~ should be 367.8°K (94.65°C) and about 212 units should be tested at this temperature.		* The low stress level should be 367.8°K (94.65°C) and about 212 units should be tested at this temperature.
	* The high stress level should be 393.15°K (120°C) and about 88 units should be tested at this temperature.		* The high stress level should be 393.15°K (120°C) and about 88 units should be tested at this temperature.

Kate Racaza at 16:02, 12 June 2014

2014-06-12T16:02:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:02, 12 June 2014
Line 23:		Line 23:
	A total of 300 units are available for testing. The objectives of the test plan are to:		A total of 300 units are available for testing. The objectives of the test plan are to:

	* Determine the two temperature levels that ~~can~~ be used in the test.		* Determine the two temperature levels that should be used in the test.
	* Determine the number of test units at each temperature level.		* Determine the number of test units at each temperature level.

Kate Racaza at 15:56, 12 June 2014

2014-06-12T15:56:57Z

Kate Racaza at 15:50, 12 June 2014

2014-06-12T15:50:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:50, 12 June 2014
Line 6:		Line 6:
	{{Reference_Example_Heading1}}		{{Reference_Example_Heading1}}

	The data set is from Example 20.5 on page 542 in the book '''Statistical Methods for Reliability Data''' by Dr. Meeker and Dr. Escobar, John Wiley & Sons, 1998.		The data set is from Example 20.5 on page 542 in the book ''Statistical Methods for Reliability Data'' by Dr. Meeker and Dr. Escobar, John Wiley & Sons, 1998.


	{{Reference_Example_Heading2}}		{{Reference_Example_Heading2}}

	A Weibull distribution with Arrhenius relationship is used. The Arrhenius relationship uses the following formula		A Weibull distribution with an Arrhenius life stress relationship is used. The Arrhenius relationship uses the following formula:


Line 17:		Line 17:


	The planning values of the model parameters ~~used in~~ the test plan are <math>\beta\,\!</math> = 1.667,   <math>\beta_{0}\,\!</math> = -16.7333 and <math>\beta_{1}\,\!</math> = 0.7265. These planning values were obtained based on the following assumptions: 0.1% of the units will fail in 6 months (183 hours) at 50°C, and 90% ~~would~~ fail in 6 months at 120°C. This information is given in Example 20.2 on page 535.		The planning values of the model parameters for the test plan are <math>\beta\,\!</math> = 1.667,   <math>\beta_{0}\,\!</math> = -16.7333 and <math>\beta_{1}\,\!</math> = 0.7265. These planning values were obtained based on the following assumptions: 0.1% of the units will fail in 6 months (183 hours) at 50°C, and 90% will fail in 6 months at 120°C. This information is given in Example 20.2 on page 535.

	The use temperature is 50°C (323.15°K) and the highest temperature used in the test is 120°C (393.15 °K).		The use temperature is 50°C (323.15°K) and the highest temperature that can be used in the test is 120°C (393.15 °K).

	A total of 300 units are available for testing~~. Three temperature levels can be used and 20% of the units will be tested at the middle temperature level~~. The ~~objective~~ of the test plan is to:		A total of 300 units are available for testing. The objectives of the test plan are to:

	* Determine the two temperature levels that can be used in the test.		* Determine the two temperature levels that can be used in the test.
	* Determine the number of test units at each temperature level.		* Determine the number of test units at each temperature level.

	Tests will be conducted using the created test plan. The failure data from the test ~~is then~~ used to estimate the model parameters~~. The estimated parameters are~~ used to calculate the B10 life at 50°C and its variance.		Tests will be conducted using the created test plan. The failure data from the test will be used to estimate the model parameters, which will then be used to calculate the B10 life at 50°C and its variance. Therefore, we need a test plan that will minimize the estimation variance for the B10 life at 50°C.

	~~We need to find a test plan with three temperature levels that will minimize the estimation variance for the B10 life at 50°C.~~

			{{Reference_Example_Heading3}}

	~~{{Reference_Example_Heading3}}~~		The two level statistically optimum test plan is:
			* 212 units should be tested at 95°C (368.15 °K)
			* 88 units should be tested at 120°C (393.15 °K).

	~~The two level statistically optimum~~ test plan ~~is: 212 units will be tested at 95°C (368.15 °K)~~, ~~and 88 units will be tested at 120°C (393.15 °K).~~		Based on this test plan, the estimated standard error for the B10 life at 50°C is <math>Ase\left [log \left(\hat{t}_{0.1}(50) \right) \right] = 0.3794\,\!</math>.
	~~The~~ estimated standard error for the B10 life at 50°C ~~from this test plan~~ is <math>Ase\left [log \left(\hat{t}_{0.1}(50) \right) \right] = 0.3794\,\!</math>.

Kate Racaza: Created page with '{{Reference Example|ALTA_Reference_Examples_Banner.png|ALTA_Reference_Examples}} This example compares the results for the 2-Level Statistically Optimum test plan for one stress…'

2014-06-11T18:14:20Z

Created page with '{{Reference Example|ALTA_Reference_Examples_Banner.png|ALTA_Reference_Examples}} This example compares the results for the 2-Level Statistically Optimum test plan for one stress…'

New page

{{Reference Example|ALTA_Reference_Examples_Banner.png|ALTA_Reference_Examples}}

This example compares the results for the 2-Level Statistically Optimum test plan for one stress.

{{Reference_Example_Heading1}}

The data set is from Example 20.5 on page 542 in the book '''Statistical Methods for Reliability Data''' by Dr. Meeker and Dr. Escobar, John Wiley & Sons, 1998.

{{Reference_Example_Heading2}}

A Weibull distribution with Arrhenius relationship is used. The Arrhenius relationship uses the following formula

::<math>ln(\eta) = \beta_{0} + \beta_{1} \times \frac{11605}{T}\,\!</math>

The planning values of the model parameters used in the test plan are <math>\beta\,\!</math> = 1.667,   <math>\beta_{0}\,\!</math> = -16.7333 and <math>\beta_{1}\,\!</math> = 0.7265. These planning values were obtained based on the following assumptions: 0.1% of the units will fail in 6 months (183 hours) at 50°C, and 90% would fail in 6 months at 120°C. This information is given in Example 20.2 on page 535.

The use temperature is 50°C (323.15°K) and the highest temperature used in the test is 120°C (393.15 °K).

A total of 300 units are available for testing. Three temperature levels can be used and 20% of the units will be tested at the middle temperature level. The objective of the test plan is to:

* Determine the two temperature levels that can be used in the test.
* Determine the number of test units at each temperature level.

Tests will be conducted using the created test plan. The failure data from the test is then used to estimate the model parameters. The estimated parameters are used to calculate the B10 life at 50°C and its variance.

We need to find a test plan with three temperature levels that will minimize the estimation variance for the B10 life at 50°C.

{{Reference_Example_Heading3}}

The two level statistically optimum test plan is: 212 units will be tested at 95°C (368.15 °K), and 88 units will be tested at 120°C (393.15 °K).
The estimated standard error for the B10 life at 50°C from this test plan is <math>Ase\left [log \left(\hat{t}_{0.1}(50) \right) \right] = 0.3794\,\!</math>.

{{Reference_Example_Heading4|ALTA}}

The planning information is entered in ALTA, as shown below.

[[Image: Optimum plan one stress.png|center]]

The resulting 2-level statistically optimum test plan in ALTA is shown below.

[[Image: Optimum plan one stress test plan.png|center|700 px]]

The test plan shows that:

* The low stress level (row 23) should be 367.8°K (94.65°C) and about 212 units should be tested at this temperature.
* The high stress level (row 24) should be 393.15°K (120°C) and about 88 units should be tested at this temperature.

The results above are the same as the results given in the book.

The estimated standard deviation of the log B10 life at 50°C can be calculate using the '''BX% Life Estimate''' result in the output from ALTA (row 26), as given below:

::<math>Ase\left[log \left(\hat{t}_{0.1}(50) \right) \right] = \frac{Ase\hat{t}_{0.1}(50)}{\hat{t}_{0.1}(50)} = \frac{1134.2}{2990.09} = 0.37932\,\!</math>

This is very close to the estimated standard deviation in the book. The difference is probably caused by the rounding error.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:20, 13 June 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Reference Example\|ALTA_Reference_Examples_Banner.png\|ALTA_Reference_Examples}}		{{Reference Example\|ALTA_Reference_Examples_Banner.png\|ALTA_Reference_Examples}}

	This example compares the results for the 2~~-Level Statistically Optimum~~ test plan for one stress.		This example compares the results for the 2 level statistically optimum test plan for one stress.


Line 11:		Line 11:
	{{Reference_Example_Heading2}}		{{Reference_Example_Heading2}}

	A Weibull distribution with an Arrhenius life stress relationship is used. The Arrhenius relationship uses the following formula:		A Weibull distribution with an Arrhenius life-stress relationship is used. The Arrhenius relationship uses the following formula:


Line 31:		Line 31:
	{{Reference_Example_Heading3}}		{{Reference_Example_Heading3}}

	The ~~two-~~level statistically optimum test plan is:		The 2 level statistically optimum test plan is:
	* 212 units should be tested at 95°C (368.15 °K)		* 212 units should be tested at 95°C (368.15 °K)
	* 88 units should be tested at 120°C (393.15 °K).		* 88 units should be tested at 120°C (393.15 °K).
Line 46:		Line 46:


	The resulting ~~two-level statistically optimum~~ test plan in ALTA is shown below.		The resulting test plan in ALTA is shown below.

	[[Image: Optimum plan one stress test plan.png\|center\|700 px]]		[[Image: Optimum plan one stress test plan.png\|center\|700 px]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:56, 12 June 2014
Line 31:		Line 31:
	{{Reference_Example_Heading3}}		{{Reference_Example_Heading3}}

	The two level statistically optimum test plan is:		The two-level statistically optimum test plan is:
	* 212 units should be tested at 95°C (368.15 °K)		* 212 units should be tested at 95°C (368.15 °K)
	* 88 units should be tested at 120°C (393.15 °K).		* 88 units should be tested at 120°C (393.15 °K).
Line 46:		Line 46:


	The resulting 2-level statistically optimum test plan in ALTA is shown below.		The resulting two-level statistically optimum test plan in ALTA is shown below.

	[[Image: Optimum plan one stress test plan.png\|center\|700 px]]		[[Image: Optimum plan one stress test plan.png\|center\|700 px]]


	~~The~~ test plan shows that:		This test plan shows that:

	* The low stress level (row 23) should be 367.8°K (94.65°C) and about 212 units should be tested at this temperature.		* The low stress level (row 23 in the picture above) should be 367.8°K (94.65°C) and about 212 units should be tested at this temperature.
	* The high stress level ~~(row 24)~~ should be 393.15°K (120°C) and about 88 units should be tested at this temperature.		* The high stress level should be 393.15°K (120°C) and about 88 units should be tested at this temperature.

	The results above are the same as the results given in the book.		The results above are the same as the results given in the book.


	The estimated standard deviation of the log B10 life at 50°C can be calculate ~~using~~ the '''BX% Life Estimate''' ~~result in the output from ALTA~~ (row 26)~~, as given below:~~		The estimated standard deviation of the log B10 life at 50°C can be calculate from the values given in the '''BX% Life Estimate''' area (row 26) of the results shown above.

	::<math>Ase\left[log \left(\hat{t}_{0.1}(50) \right) \right] = \frac{Ase\hat{t}_{0.1}(50)}{\hat{t}_{0.1}(50)} = \frac{1134.2}{2990.09} = 0.37932\,\!</math>		::<math>Ase\left[log \left(\hat{t}_{0.1}(50) \right) \right] = \frac{Ase\left(\hat{t}_{0.1}(50)\right)}{\hat{t}_{0.1}(50)} = \frac{1134.2}{2990.09} = 0.37932\,\!</math>


	This is very close to the estimated standard deviation in the book. The difference is ~~probably caused by the~~ rounding error.		This is very close to the estimated standard deviation in the book. The difference is likely due to rounding error.