Warranty Data Analysis Example: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Kate Racaza (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Kate Racaza (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Reference Example}} | {{Reference Example}} | ||
This example | This example validates the results of a warranty data analysis in a Weibull++ warranty folio. | ||
Line 119: | Line 119: | ||
{{Reference_Example_Heading4}} | {{Reference_Example_Heading4}} | ||
In Weibull++, the Nevada | In Weibull++, the data set is entered into a warranty folio, using the Nevada chart format. The following pictures show the sales and returns data. | ||
[[File: warranty_sales.png|center|550px]] | |||
[[Image: warranty_returns.png|center|550px]] | |||
The following picture shows the parameters of the lognormal distribution and its associated failure/suspension data. The results are the same as the results shown in the book. | |||
[[Image: warranty_results.png|center]] | |||
The following picture shows the probability plot of the lognormal distribution. | |||
[[Image: warranty_plot.png|center|550 px]] |
Latest revision as of 16:24, 28 September 2015
New format available! This reference is now available in a new format that offers faster page load, improved display for calculations and images and more targeted search.
As of January 2024, this Reliawiki page will not continue to be updated. Please update all links and bookmarks to the latest references at Weibull examples and Weibull reference examples.