Expected Failure Time Plot: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
{| border="1" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" width="400" align="center | {| border="1" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" width="400" align="center" | ||
|+ Table 1: 5%, 50% and 95% Ranks for a sample size of 6. | |+ Table 1: 5%, 50% and 95% Ranks for a sample size of 6. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| valign="middle" align="center" | 1 | | valign="middle" align="center" | 1 | ||
| valign="middle" align="center" | 0.85% | | valign="middle" align="center" | 0.85% | ||
| valign="middle" align="center" | 10.91% | | valign="middle" align="center" | 10.91% | ||
| valign="middle" align="center" | 39.30% | | valign="middle" align="center" | 39.30% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| valign="middle" align="center" | 2 | | valign="middle" align="center" | 2 | ||
| valign="middle" align="center" | 6.29% | | valign="middle" align="center" | 6.29% | ||
| valign="middle" align="center" | 26.45% | | valign="middle" align="center" | 26.45% | ||
| valign="middle" align="center" | 58.18% | | valign="middle" align="center" | 58.18% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| valign="middle" align="center" | 3 | | valign="middle" align="center" | 3 | ||
| valign="middle" align="center" | 15.32% | | valign="middle" align="center" | 15.32% | ||
| valign="middle" align="center" | 42.14% | | valign="middle" align="center" | 42.14% | ||
| valign="middle" align="center" | 72.87% | | valign="middle" align="center" | 72.87% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| valign="middle" align="center" | 4 | | valign="middle" align="center" | 4 | ||
| valign="middle" align="center" | 27.13% | | valign="middle" align="center" | 27.13% | ||
| valign="middle" align="center" | 57.86% | | valign="middle" align="center" | 57.86% | ||
| valign="middle" align="center" | 84.68% | | valign="middle" align="center" | 84.68% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| valign="middle" align="center" | 5 | | valign="middle" align="center" | 5 | ||
| valign="middle" align="center" | 41.82% | | valign="middle" align="center" | 41.82% | ||
| valign="middle" align="center" | 73.55% | | valign="middle" align="center" | 73.55% | ||
| valign="middle" align="center" | 93.71% | | valign="middle" align="center" | 93.71% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| valign="middle" align="center" | 6 | | valign="middle" align="center" | 6 | ||
| valign="middle" align="center" | 60.70% | | valign="middle" align="center" | 60.70% | ||
| valign="middle" align="center" | | | valign="middle" align="center" | | ||
89.09% | 89.09% | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
|} | |} | ||
<br> | |||
Furthermore, consider that for the units to be tested the underlying reliability model assumption is given by | Furthermore, consider that for the units to be tested the underlying reliability model assumption is given by | ||
<br> | |||
<br> | |||
[[Category:Weibull++]] [[Category:Test_Design]] [[Category:Special_Tools]] | |||
[[Category:Weibull++]] | |||
[[Category: | |||
[[Category: | |||
Revision as of 17:04, 14 February 2011
When a reliability life test is planned it is useful to visualize the expected outcome of the experiment. The Expected Failure Time Plot (introduced by ReliaSoft in Weibull++ 8)provides such visual.
Background & Calculations
Using the cumulative binomial, for a defined sample size, one can compute a rank (Median Rank if at 50% probability) for each ordered failure.
As an example and for a sample size of 6 the 5%, 50% and 95% ranks would be as follows:
| Order Number | 5% | 50% | 95% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.85% | 10.91% | 39.30% |
| 2 | 6.29% | 26.45% | 58.18% |
| 3 | 15.32% | 42.14% | 72.87% |
| 4 | 27.13% | 57.86% | 84.68% |
| 5 | 41.82% | 73.55% | 93.71% |
| 6 | 60.70% |
89.09% |
99.15% |
Furthermore, consider that for the units to be tested the underlying reliability model assumption is given by