Stress-Strength Analysis in Design for Reliability

From ReliaWiki
Revision as of 18:50, 30 March 2012 by Lisa Hacker (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Using Stress-Strength Analysis to Determine the Required Strength Distribution

Assume the stress distribution for a component is known and it is a Weibull distribution with beta=3 and eta=2000. For the current design, the strength distribution is also a Weibull distribution with beta =1.5 and eta=4000.

Evaluate the current reliability.
If the reliability does not meet the target reliability of 90%, use the Target Reliability Parameter Estimator to determine what parameters would be required for the strength distribution in order to meet the specified target.


Solution

First, we need to create two empty Weibull++ standard folios and enter the distribution parameters for the stress and strength distributions. For example, for the stress distribution, it is:

Stress Distribution Example 2.png


Then, following the steps given in Example 1, the reliability of the current design is given in the following figure:

Stress-strength example 2 current reliability.png

The above result shows that the current reliability is about 74.05%, which is below the target value of 90%. We need to use the Target Reliability Parameter Estimator to determine the parameter for the strength distribution that would be required to meet the target. Click on the following icon:

Stress-strength example 2 target R icon.png


Choose to calculate for eta under Strength Parameters, set the Target Reliability to 90%, and click Calculate:

Stress-strength example 2 Result.png


The calculated eta is 8192.2385 hours. Click Update to perform the stress-strength analysis again using the altered parameters for the strength distribution.

The plot shows the calculated reliability indeed is 90%.

Stress-strength example 2 Confirmed Result.png


Therefore, in order to meet the reliability requirement, the component must be redesigned with the eta to be at least 8192.2385 hours.