Non-Parametric Binomial Reliability Demonstration Test: Difference between revisions

From ReliaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with '{{Reference Example}} This example compares the results for a non-parametric binomial test design. {{Reference_Example_Heading1}} The data is from Example 1-7 on page 46 in …')
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Reference Example}}
{{Reference Example}}


This example compares the results for a non-parametric binomial test design.  
This example validates the results for a non-parametric binomial test design in Weibull++.  





Latest revision as of 16:24, 28 September 2015

Weibull Reference Examples Banner.png


New format available! This reference is now available in a new format that offers faster page load, improved display for calculations and images and more targeted search.

As of January 2024, this Reliawiki page will not continue to be updated. Please update all links and bookmarks to the latest references at Weibull examples and Weibull reference examples.




Non-Parametric Binomial Reliability Demonstration Test

This example validates the results for a non-parametric binomial test design in Weibull++.


Reference Case

The data is from Example 1-7 on page 46 in the book Reliability & Life Testing Handbook Vol 2 by Dr. Kececioglu, Prentice-Hall, 1994.


Data

One hundred units are reliability tested. Ten units fail. Find the one-sided confidence limits on the reliability at the 95% confidence level.


Result

The one-sided 95% lower confidence limit is the same as the two-sided 90% lower confidence limit. The result in the book is 0.836.


Results in Weibull++

Weibull++ calculates the one-sided lower confidence limit. The result is shown next:

NonParam RDT.png