One Factor Comparison Design: Difference between revisions

From ReliaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with '{{Reference Example|{{Banner DOE Reference Examples}}}} Your text here. {{Reference_Example_Heading1}} Your text here. {{Reference_Example_Heading2}} Your text here. {{Referen…')
 
No edit summary
 
(24 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Reference Example|{{Banner DOE Reference Examples}}}}
{{Reference Example|{{Banner DOE Reference Examples}}}}
Your text here.
This example validates the calculation of the one factor comparison design in Weibull++.


{{Reference_Example_Heading1}}
{{Reference_Example_Heading1}}
Your text here.
The data are from Example 11-1 on page 71 in the book ''Design and Analysis of Experiments''  by Douglas C. Montgomery, John Wiley & Sons, 2001.


{{Reference_Example_Heading2}}
{{Reference_Example_Heading2}}
Your text here.
 
To test the hypothesis:
 
::<math>\begin{align}
H_0:\mu_1=\mu_2=...=\mu_5 \\
 
H_1:\mu_1\ne\mu_2\ne...\ne\mu_5
\end{align}</math>
 
{| {{Table}}
!rowspan="2" | Weight percentage of cotton
!colspan="5" | Observed tensile strength  (lb/in<math>^2</math>)
|-
!style="background:#f0f0f0;"|1
!style="background:#f0f0f0;"|2
!style="background:#f0f0f0;"|3
!style="background:#f0f0f0;"|4
!style="background:#f0f0f0;"|5
|-
| 15||7||7||15||11||9
|-
| 20||12||17||12||18||18
|-
| 25||14||18||18||19||19
|-
| 30||19||25||22||19||23
|-
| 35||7||10||11||15||11
 
|}
 


{{Reference_Example_Heading3}}
{{Reference_Example_Heading3}}
Your text here.
 
From the book the ANOVA table is:
 
{| {{Table}}
 
!Source of Variation
!Sum of Squares
!Degrees of Freedom
!Mean Square
!<math>F_0\,\!</math>
!P value
|-
| Cotton weight percentage||475.76||4||118.94||14.76||<0.01
|-
| Error ||161.20||20||8.06||||
|-
| Total ||636.96||24||||||
 
|-
 
|}
 
Suppose that the experimenter selects <math>\alpha=0.05\,\!</math>. Since <math>F_{0.05,4,20}=2.87\,\!</math>,  and <math>14.76 >2.87 \,\!</math>, the engineer rejects <math>H_0\,\!</math> and concludes that treatment means differ.
 


{{Reference_Example_Heading4|DOE++}}
{{Reference_Example_Heading4|DOE++}}
Your text here.
The software results match the book results and the conclusions are matched. The ANOVA table is:
 
[[Image:one_factor_anova.png|center]]
 
Since the P Value = 9.13E-6 < 0.01, we reject <math>H_0\,\!</math>.

Latest revision as of 21:09, 18 September 2023

DOE Reference Examples Banner.png


New format available! This reference is now available in a new format that offers faster page load, improved display for calculations and images and more targeted search.

As of January 2024, this Reliawiki page will not continue to be updated. Please update all links and bookmarks to the latest references at DOE examples and DOE reference examples.




One Factor Comparison Design

This example validates the calculation of the one factor comparison design in Weibull++.

Reference Case

The data are from Example 11-1 on page 71 in the book Design and Analysis of Experiments by Douglas C. Montgomery, John Wiley & Sons, 2001.

Data

To test the hypothesis:

[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{align} H_0:\mu_1=\mu_2=...=\mu_5 \\ H_1:\mu_1\ne\mu_2\ne...\ne\mu_5 \end{align} }[/math]
Weight percentage of cotton Observed tensile strength (lb/in[math]\displaystyle{ ^2 }[/math])
1 2 3 4 5
15 7 7 15 11 9
20 12 17 12 18 18
25 14 18 18 19 19
30 19 25 22 19 23
35 7 10 11 15 11


Result

From the book the ANOVA table is:

Source of Variation Sum of Squares Degrees of Freedom Mean Square [math]\displaystyle{ F_0\,\! }[/math] P value
Cotton weight percentage 475.76 4 118.94 14.76 <0.01
Error 161.20 20 8.06
Total 636.96 24

Suppose that the experimenter selects [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha=0.05\,\! }[/math]. Since [math]\displaystyle{ F_{0.05,4,20}=2.87\,\! }[/math], and [math]\displaystyle{ 14.76 \gt 2.87 \,\! }[/math], the engineer rejects [math]\displaystyle{ H_0\,\! }[/math] and concludes that treatment means differ.


Results in DOE++

The software results match the book results and the conclusions are matched. The ANOVA table is:

One factor anova.png

Since the P Value = 9.13E-6 < 0.01, we reject [math]\displaystyle{ H_0\,\! }[/math].