Operational Testing Example: Difference between revisions

From ReliaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>{{Banner RGA Examples}}
<noinclude>{{Banner RGA Examples}}
''This example appears in the [[Operational Testing|Reliability Growth and Repairable System Analysis Reference]]''.
''This example appears in the [https://help.reliasoft.com/reference/reliability_growth_and_repairable_system_analysis Reliability growth reference]''.
</noinclude>
</noinclude>


Line 6: Line 6:


#After estimating the parameters, verify the assumption of <math>\beta = 1\,\!</math>.  
#After estimating the parameters, verify the assumption of <math>\beta = 1\,\!</math>.  
#Estimate the demonstrated MTBF of the system.
#Estimate the instantaneous MTBF of the system at the end of the test (demonstrated MTBF).
#Estimate the MTBF that can be expected after the BD failure modes are addressed (projected MTBF) and the maximum MTBF that can be achieved if all BD modes that exist in the system were discovered and fixed according to the current maintenance strategy (growth potential MTBF).
#Estimate the MTBF that can be expected after the BD failure modes are addressed (projected MTBF) and the maximum MTBF that can be achieved if all BD modes that exist in the system were discovered and fixed according to the current maintenance strategy (growth potential MTBF).


Line 70: Line 70:
<li>The entered operational testing data and the estimated parameters are given below.
<li>The entered operational testing data and the estimated parameters are given below.


[[File:OperationalTestData.png|center|650px|Estimated parameters for operational testing data.]]
[[File:OperationalTestData.png|center|600px]]


The assumption of <math>\beta = 1\,\!</math> can be verified by looking at the confidence bounds on <math>\beta\,\!</math> via the Quick Calculation Pad (QCP). The 90% 2-sided Crow confidence bounds on <math>\beta\,\!</math> are shown next.
The assumption of <math>\beta = 1\,\!</math> can be verified by looking at the confidence bounds on <math>\beta\,\!</math> via the Quick Calculation Pad (QCP). The 90% 2-sided Crow confidence bounds on <math>\beta\,\!</math> are shown next.


[[File:OTBeta=1.png|center|Confidence bounds on Beta.]]
[[File:OTBeta=1.png|center|450px]]


Since the confidence bounds on <math>\beta\,\!</math> include one, then you can fail to reject the hypothesis that <math>\beta = 1\,\!</math>.
Since the confidence bounds on <math>\beta\,\!</math> include one, then you can fail to reject the hypothesis that <math>\beta = 1\,\!</math>.
Line 84: Line 84:
<li>The projected MTBF and growth potential values can be displayed via the Growth Potential MTBF plot.
<li>The projected MTBF and growth potential values can be displayed via the Growth Potential MTBF plot.


[[File:OTGPMTBFPlot.png|center|650px|Growth Potential MTBF plot for operational testing.]]
[[File:OTGPMTBFPlot.png|center|450px]]


The plot shows that the projected MTBF equals 42.3824 hours, and the growth potential MTBF equals 62.9518 hours.
The plot shows that the projected MTBF equals 42.3824 hours, and the growth potential MTBF equals 62.9518 hours.
</li>
</li>
</ol>
</ol>

Latest revision as of 21:35, 18 September 2023

RGA Examples Banner.png


New format available! This reference is now available in a new format that offers faster page load, improved display for calculations and images and more targeted search.

As of January 2024, this Reliawiki page will not continue to be updated. Please update all links and bookmarks to the latest references at RGA examples and RGA reference examples.




This example appears in the Reliability growth reference.


Consider two systems that have been placed into operational testing. The data for each system are given below. Do the following:

  1. After estimating the parameters, verify the assumption of [math]\displaystyle{ \beta = 1\,\! }[/math].
  2. Estimate the instantaneous MTBF of the system at the end of the test (demonstrated MTBF).
  3. Estimate the MTBF that can be expected after the BD failure modes are addressed (projected MTBF) and the maximum MTBF that can be achieved if all BD modes that exist in the system were discovered and fixed according to the current maintenance strategy (growth potential MTBF).
Operational Testing Data
System # 1 2
Start Time (Hr) 0 0
End Time (Hr) 504 541
Failure Times (Hr) and
Failure Modes
21 BD43 83 BD37
29 A42 83 BD43
43 BD10 83 BD46
43 BD11 169 A45
43 A39 213 A18
66 A20 299 A42
115 BD34 375 A1
159 BD49 431 BD16
199 BD47
202 BD47
222 BD47
248 BD14
248 BD15
255 BD41
286 BD40
286 BD48
304 BD47
320 BD13
348 BD11
364 BD44
404 BD44
410 BD4
429 BD47

The BD modes are implemented at the end of the test and assume a fixed effectiveness factor equal to 0.6 (i.e., 40% of the failure intensity will remain after the fixes are implemented).

Solution

  1. The entered operational testing data and the estimated parameters are given below.
    OperationalTestData.png

    The assumption of [math]\displaystyle{ \beta = 1\,\! }[/math] can be verified by looking at the confidence bounds on [math]\displaystyle{ \beta\,\! }[/math] via the Quick Calculation Pad (QCP). The 90% 2-sided Crow confidence bounds on [math]\displaystyle{ \beta\,\! }[/math] are shown next.

    OTBeta=1.png

    Since the confidence bounds on [math]\displaystyle{ \beta\,\! }[/math] include one, then you can fail to reject the hypothesis that [math]\displaystyle{ \beta = 1\,\! }[/math].

  2. From #1, the demonstrated MTBF (DMTBF) equals 33.7097 hours.
  3. The projected MTBF and growth potential values can be displayed via the Growth Potential MTBF plot.
    OTGPMTBFPlot.png

    The plot shows that the projected MTBF equals 42.3824 hours, and the growth potential MTBF equals 62.9518 hours.