Template:Aw probability plotting: Difference between revisions

From ReliaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
====Probability Plotting====
#REDIRECT [[Distributions_Used_in_Accelerated_Testing]]
 
One method of calculating the parameters of the Weibull distribution is by using probability plotting. To better illustrate this procedure, consider the following example [[Reference Appendix D: References|[18]]].
 
===== Example 3  =====
 
Let's assume six identical units are being reliability tested at the same application and operation stress levels. All of these units fail during the test after operating the following times (in hours), <span class="texhtml">''T''<sub>''i''</sub></span>&nbsp;: 93, 34, 16, 120, 53 and 75. The steps for using probability plotting to determine the parameters of the Weibull <span class="texhtml">''pdf''</span> are as follows: <br>
 
:*Rank the failure times in ascending order as shown next.
 
<br>
<center><math>\begin{matrix}
  \text{Failure} & \text{Failure Order Number}  \\
  \text{Time (Hr)} & \text{out of a Sample Size of 6}  \\
  \text{16} & \text{1}  \\
  \text{34} & \text{2}  \\
  \text{53} & \text{3}  \\
  \text{75} & \text{4}  \\
  \text{93} & \text{5}  \\
  \text{120} & \text{6}  \\
\end{matrix}</math></center>
<br>
 
:*Obtain their median rank plotting positions. The failure, with their corresponding median ranks, are shown next.
 
<br>
<center><math>\begin{matrix}
  \text{Failure} & \text{Median}  \\
  \text{Time (Hr)} & \text{Rank, }%  \\
  \text{16} & \text{10}\text{.91}  \\
  \text{34} & \text{26}\text{.44}  \\
  \text{53} & \text{42}\text{.14}  \\
  \text{75} & \text{57}\text{.86}  \\
  \text{93} & \text{73}\text{.56}  \\
  \text{120} & \text{89}\text{.10}  \\
\end{matrix}</math></center>
<br>
 
:*On a Weibull probability paper, plot the times and their corresponding ranks. The next figure displays an example of a Weibull probability paper.
 
<br> [[Image:ALTA4.8.gif|thumb|center|300px]] <br>
 
:*Draw the best possible straight line through the plotted points.
:*Obtain the slope of this line by drawing a line, parallel to the one just obtained, through the slope indicator. This value is the estimate of the shape parameter <math>\widehat{\beta }</math>. In this case <math>\widehat{\beta }=1.4</math>.
:*At the <span class="texhtml">''Q''(''t'') = 63.2%</span> ordinate point, draw a straight horizontal line until this line intersects the fitted straight line. Draw a vertical line through this intersection until it crosses the abscissa. The value at the intersection of the abscissa is the estimate of <math>\widehat{\eta }</math> . For this case <math>\widehat{\eta }=76</math> hours. (This is always at 63.2% since <math>Q(T)=1-{{e}^{-{{(\tfrac{\eta }{\eta })}^{\beta }}}}=1-{{e}^{-1}}=0.632=63.2%</math>.)
 
<br> [[Image:ALTA4.9.gif|thumb|center|300px]] <br> Now any reliability value for any mission time <span class="texhtml">''t''</span> can be obtained. For example, the reliability for a mission of 15 hours (or any other time) can now be obtained either from the plot or analytically.
 
To obtain the value from the plot, draw a vertical line from the abscissa, at <span class="texhtml">''t'' = 15</span> hours, to the fitted line. Draw a horizontal line from this intersection to the ordinate and read <span class="texhtml">''Q''(''t'')</span>, in this case <span class="texhtml">''Q''(''t'' = 15) = 9.8%</span>. Thus, <span class="texhtml">''R''(''t'' = 15) = 1 − ''Q''(''t'') = 90.2%</span>. This can also be obtained analytically from the Weibull reliability function since both of the parameters are known. <br>
 
::<math>R(t=15)={{e}^{-{{\left( \tfrac{15}{\eta } \right)}^{\beta }}}}={{e}^{-{{\left( \tfrac{15}{76} \right)}^{1.4}}}}=90.2%</math>
 
<br>

Latest revision as of 10:17, 9 August 2012